Limited to Limitless Transformational Consultants

Limited to Limitless Transformational Consultants

Share this post

Limited to Limitless Transformational Consultants
Limited to Limitless Transformational Consultants
A New Lens on DEI

A New Lens on DEI

Where DEI Missed the Mark

Lisa Murphy's avatar
Lisa Murphy
Nov 27, 2024
∙ Paid

Share this post

Limited to Limitless Transformational Consultants
Limited to Limitless Transformational Consultants
A New Lens on DEI
1
Share

A Better Approach to Building Equitable Workplaces

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives were introduced with the goal of fostering fairness and representation in workplaces. However, despite these apparently good intentions, the execution of many DEI programs has frequently fallen far short of their ideals. Instead of creating unity and innovation, these programs have often resulted in unintended consequences—tokenism, division, and diminished trust—undermining both individual and organizational success.

"True inclusion isn’t about checking boxes; it’s about creating workplaces where every individual is valued for their unique contributions." – L. Murphy

The Shortcomings of DEI

At its core, DEI aims to address systemic inequities, but the methods often employed create more problems than solutions. Tokenism, for instance, remains a prevalent issue in DEI implementation. This practice of hiring or promoting individuals primarily based on demographic markers, such as race, gender, or ethnicity, leads to several detrimental outcomes:

  1. Tokenism Undermines Meritocracy
    When decisions are based on identity rather than ability, it erodes confidence in the fairness of the workplace. Tokenism can stigmatize individuals, as their peers may perceive their position as undeserved—even if they are fully qualified. Research from Recruitee (n.d.) highlights how tokenistic practices alienate employees and increase turnover among underrepresented groups, who often feel unsupported and undervalued.

  2. Division Rather Than Unity
    DEI programs often emphasize differences over common goals, unintentionally deepening divisions. Duyile (2022) notes that such approaches can amplify stereotypes and foster resentment, as team members view each other through the lens of identity rather than shared values or contributions.

  3. Missed Opportunities for True Growth
    Businesses must prioritize long-term cohesion and performance. Many DEI programs focus on demographic representation without addressing the underlying factors that drive success, such as aligning talent with roles, fostering collaboration, and building a culture of mutual respect.

“Trust is the glue of life. It’s the most essential ingredient in effective communication. It’s the foundational principle that holds all relationships." – S.R. Covey

A clean, infographic-style visual showing tokenism statistics: two contrasting pie charts. One chart highlights turnover rates in workplaces using demographic hiring; the other shows retention rates in merit-based systems. Minimalist style with professional blue and gray tones
We are even seeing large corporations such as Walmart, Ford, Tractor Supply, Molson Coors, Harley-Davidson, and Lowe's run the numbers and run away from DEI policies.

There are several nuances to merit-based systems, that enhance a culture of progress and success, while honoring every team member. Zappos, under Tony Hsieh, was a brilliant model.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Limited to Limitless Transformational Consultants to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Lisa Murphy
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share